The title of this post is misleading, and rightly so: the saga that keeps breath Stuxnet tens of thousands of people beyond the circle of insiders and professionals Security (as defined in very broad generalities but are sometimes useful), just maybe gain popular acclaim!
We may retort that this was already the case since late 2010 but immediately I counter by saying the developments of recent days: in France alone, some twenty articles from world through Figaro or Alsace Stuxnet would tell us that although the work of the U.S. and Israel, they have even tested their evil work on centrifuges at the nuclear plant at Dimona!
Where I'm starting to feel a certain irritation arise in me is to trace the origin of information, the New York Times an AFP dispatch takes to finally end up in a concert or copied and pasted only the scheduling of certain paragraphs and cosmetic changes can distinguish the "original" (AFP) and its palimpsest! You can check this obvious (and it stings:)!
The only relatively healthy and critical approach as to the veracity of the facts comes from D. Refilled via the website NanoJV . Some caution because D. Bourra can not be regarded with certainty as being entirely objective and / or unbiased (which it does not seem to assert that matter).
I naively thought that a journalist worthy of the name needs to check his sources, and pushing the vice, to write articles and conservative arguments on the facts and only facts, I remain amazed by the level of amateurism. So ladies and gentlemen happy cardholders a journalist, take advice from your correspondents pointed but services of state and field specialists ! On the whole, I prefer a cautious article seeking to sweep all assumptions, even if it does not provide satisfactory answers, an article "parrot" who only copy of a dispatch news agency and operates an emptiness ill of sensationalism!
Edit: I advise ticket Sid on the same subject .
Edit: I advise ticket Sid on the same subject .
0 comments:
Post a Comment