In September 2010, I mentioned the rise of the U.S. CYBERCOM , the unit responsible for U.S. arms unite its distributed counterparts in the Army ("Army Cyber Command "), Navy ("Cyber Command Fleet"), the Air Force ("Air Force Cyber Command " ) and finally the Marine Corps ("USMC Cyber Forces Command Cyberspace").
These entities are responsible for the military struggle against threats in cyberspace and are equipped with offensive weapons and non-kinetic. They are however not only because the DHS, FBI or the NSA also have their own strengths. We know of course that the U.S. has a military budget and homeland security unparalleled in the world but I would like to stress the desirability of maintaining a "healthy" competition among all agencies and entities: ultimately, they are fighting against the same threats themselves if they have different origins and motivations, while developing their own specificities. It is an incomparable wealth that illustrates the principle of "the sum of my entities / personalities is slightly higher than the amounts taken individually".
I remain very respectful and even somewhat fascinated when one or other of its entities publishes its own employment doctrine . Even more fascinating, for example, when measuring the degree of difficulty for a European integrated agency (ENISA *) or even "local" ( ANSSI *) to publish such documents. By respect spite, I do not even speak of means that are (or should) be involved!
PS: It is true that I abuse it anyway. ENISA has published a guide management of cyber incidents last month, big step indeed! And ANSSI comes, not to inherit a decree "all hot" last Friday, a new feature " if major cyber attack against the Nation, [to] organize the response and decide on the first urgent measures to implement such by government and run by operators of electronic communications. Here we are reassured !
0 comments:
Post a Comment